Reference List:
1.WORLD FUTURE FUND, BOX 1829, OLD TOWN, ALEXANDRIA, VA. 22313 U.S.A.E-MAIL: wffol@aol.com, PHONE 703-329-3006, INTERNET: http://www.worldfuturefund.org
These sites lead me to monitoring hate speech and censorship on the internet/cyberspace. The focus of my search also lead to cyber crimes and governments like China who have the strictest enforcement. I also ran into blogs like newsbusters.org that also gave information about keeping track and busting people.
2. An Empirical Analysis of Internet Filtering in China"www.Lokman.org
3. http://www.booksatoz.com/censorship/censor.htm
4. www.stormfront.orgwww.Lokman.org
5.Rights & Democracy "Corporations and the Development of Surveillance Technology in the People's Republic of China
6. www.Lokman.org
7. http://www.sxccal.edu/stmat/ug_comsc/Internet%20Censorship.pps#256,1,Internet Censorship
8. newsbusters.org/blogs/kerry-picket/2008/11/21/new-ag-appointee-advocated-stifle-speech-web - 72k - Cached - Similar pages
9. www.ncac.org/action_issues/Hate_Speech.cfm - 23k - Cached
10. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2006/may/28/news.humanrights1 This is a newspaper article I found on the guardian regarding censorship.
11. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-24451139.html Internet censorship which is not workable in government.
12.HowStuffWorks "How Internet Censorship Works"
Feb 5, 2008 ... One issue connected with Internet censorship is net neutrality. Watch this video from PodTech.net to learn more about what net neutrality is ...c
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Censorship on Cyberspace
The first search terms that I could thing of was censorship then the search directed me to censorship of hate speech in cyberspace. Internet censorship and human rights groups monitoring hate speech on cyberspace was another direction with governments like China doing massive censorship.
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
The People's Republic of China probably has the most massive and comprehensive campaign of internet censorship in the world, particularly when it comes to block Internet IP addresses. According to one recent report from the organization Reporters Without Frontiers (see "Living Dangerously on the Net"), the Chinese government employs as many as 30,000 people to police Internet providers in China. Other reports below make it clear that on a regular basis the Chinese government restricts access to tens of thousands of web sites. This number is constantly on the rise.
HARVARD LAW SCHOOL REPORTS ON INTERNET FILTERING
"An Empirical Analysis of Internet Filtering in China"
The People of China has the most massive and comprehensive campaign of internet censorship.
The People's Republic of China probably has the most massive and comprehensive campaign of internet censorship in the world, particularly when it comes to block Internet IP addresses. According to one recent report from the organization Reporters Without Frontiers (see "Living Dangerously on the Net"), the Chinese government employs as many as 30,000 people to police Internet providers in China. Other reports below make it clear that on a regular basis the Chinese government restricts access to tens of thousands of web sites. This number is constantly on the rise.
HARVARD LAW SCHOOL REPORTS ON INTERNET FILTERING
"An Empirical Analysis of Internet Filtering in China"
The People of China has the most massive and comprehensive campaign of internet censorship.
Internet Censorship
http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Censorship/Internet%20Censorship%20Report.htm
More details on internet censorship and IP addresses.
More details on internet censorship and IP addresses.
Monitoring
http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Censorship/Internet%20Censorship%20Report.htm
Regulating Hate Speech in cyberspace
Regulating Hate Speech in Cyberspace: Issues of Desirability and Efficacy.
Authors:
Nemes, Irene
Source:
Information & Communications Technology Law; Oct2002, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p193-220, 28p
Document Type:
Article
Subject Terms:
*HATE speech*CYBERSPACE
Abstract:
Cyber-libertarians advocate a free and unfettered cyberspace, unencumbered by regulation. Despite this idealised view, nations around the world are asserting their right to enforce individual regimes of content regulation. Universal agreement on Internet content regulation is almost impossible to obtain. Even in an area that is universally abhorrent—child pornography—the First Amendment to the United States Constitution stands as a stumbling block to effective government regulation. When the content under discussion concerns hate speech, consensus becomes more elusive. There are those who argue that freedom of speech principles preclude censorship of opinion, and that more speech is the best antidote to racist views. Others argue that hate speech silences minority opinion and is really an equality issue, which if not addressed, runs counter to International Human Rights principles. Nations such as Germany and France have prohibited hate speech on the Internet, and have brought both criminal and civil penalties against defendants. However, enforcement is fraught with difficulties, especially when the defendants are not nationals, and when the content emanates from foreign jurisdictions. The Council of Europe has recently moved to include an additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime. This Protocol would cover offences of racist or xenophobic propaganda, making them subject to reciprocal enforcement provisions by Member States. Whether international efforts can succeed where a piecemeal approach has failed is yet to be seen. Although the United States and its First Amendment currently present the greatest obstacle to hate speech regulation, technological advances as well as judicial development in First Amendment jurisprudence may yet provide an avenue for regulating hate speech in cyberspace. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Information & Communications Technology Law is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts)
ISSN:
13600834
DOI:
Authors:
Nemes, Irene
Source:
Information & Communications Technology Law; Oct2002, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p193-220, 28p
Document Type:
Article
Subject Terms:
*HATE speech*CYBERSPACE
Abstract:
Cyber-libertarians advocate a free and unfettered cyberspace, unencumbered by regulation. Despite this idealised view, nations around the world are asserting their right to enforce individual regimes of content regulation. Universal agreement on Internet content regulation is almost impossible to obtain. Even in an area that is universally abhorrent—child pornography—the First Amendment to the United States Constitution stands as a stumbling block to effective government regulation. When the content under discussion concerns hate speech, consensus becomes more elusive. There are those who argue that freedom of speech principles preclude censorship of opinion, and that more speech is the best antidote to racist views. Others argue that hate speech silences minority opinion and is really an equality issue, which if not addressed, runs counter to International Human Rights principles. Nations such as Germany and France have prohibited hate speech on the Internet, and have brought both criminal and civil penalties against defendants. However, enforcement is fraught with difficulties, especially when the defendants are not nationals, and when the content emanates from foreign jurisdictions. The Council of Europe has recently moved to include an additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime. This Protocol would cover offences of racist or xenophobic propaganda, making them subject to reciprocal enforcement provisions by Member States. Whether international efforts can succeed where a piecemeal approach has failed is yet to be seen. Although the United States and its First Amendment currently present the greatest obstacle to hate speech regulation, technological advances as well as judicial development in First Amendment jurisprudence may yet provide an avenue for regulating hate speech in cyberspace. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Information & Communications Technology Law is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts)
ISSN:
13600834
DOI:
record (Permalink):
http://proxy.ohiolink.edu:9099/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=8588016&site=ehost-live
Cut and Paste:
Regulating Hate Speech in Cyberspace: Issues of Desirability and Efficacy.
Database:
Academic Search Complete
http://proxy.ohiolink.edu:9099/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=8588016&site=ehost-live
Cut and Paste:
Regulating Hate Speech in Cyberspace: Issues of Desirability and Efficacy.
Database:
Academic Search Complete
Monday, December 8, 2008
How do we have censorship for hate speech on Cyberspace.
Bernardi, D. (2007). Racism and Pornography: Evidence, Paradigms, and Publishing. . (pp. 116-121). University of Texas Press. Retrieved November 20, 2008, from Academic Search Complete database.
Archee, R. (1997, February). The dark side of the 'Net. Your Computer, Retrieved November 20, 2008, from Academic Search Complete database.
Nemes, I. (2002, October). Regulating Hate Speech in Cyberspace: Issues of Desirability and Efficacy. Information & Communications Technology Law, 11(3), 193-220. Retrieved November 20, 2008, doi:10.1080/1360083022000031902
Archee, R. (1997, February). The dark side of the 'Net. Your Computer, Retrieved November 20, 2008, from Academic Search Complete database.
Nemes, I. (2002, October). Regulating Hate Speech in Cyberspace: Issues of Desirability and Efficacy. Information & Communications Technology Law, 11(3), 193-220. Retrieved November 20, 2008, doi:10.1080/1360083022000031902
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)